Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1920No. 9401PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error to Adams District Court, Hon. H. S. Class, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The plaintiff in error was convicted as an accessory in the robbery of one Irene Nolan. He was charged in the indictment as a principal, and as follows: “That Frank H. Mulligan on, to-wit, the second day of January, 1918, at the County of Adams and State of Colorado, did feloniously and violently take and steal one platinum ring set with one diamond about three karats, with three smaller diamonds on each side, of the value of twelve hundred dollars ($1,200) ; and one platinum ring set with 2% karat diamond, with one 2 karat diamond on each side of the value of twelve hundred dollars; and one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Benedict v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  5. Noble v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Oaks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. People v. ScheidtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Block v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. People v. BucknerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API