Legal Opinion

Benedict v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the District Court of Gilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The defendant was tried and convicted of the infamous crime against nature and sentenced to the penitentiary. To reverse the judgment a number of errors are assigned, only three of which are argued by counsel for plaintiff in error, and they are the only ones that require consideration.

The point is made that the defendant was not furnished, previous to, or at the time of, his arraignment, with a copy of the information and a list of the jurors and of the people’s witnesses, as the statute prescribes. As originally made up, the record does not affirmatively show that this requirement was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. People v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. SwaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. BlondinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API