Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Mills
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 25, 2005No. 1:03-cv-00515PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction.
On the evening of September 17, 2001, a police pursuit of armed suspects ended with the shooting death of a police officer and, in a ease of mistaken identity, the non-fatal shooting by police of a civilian witness. That witness, Plaintiff Stephen R. Flynn, filed the instant action claiming, among other things, unreasonable seizure and the use of excessive force in violation of his constitutional rights. Defendants argue that they are entitled to summary judgment under the doctrine of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mason-Funk v. City of NeenahDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Caretolive v. Von EschenbachDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011