Board of Supervisors v. Woodall
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1ConcurrenceHaire, Presiding Judge
I cannot concur in that portion of Judge Froeb’s opinion which discusses the jurisdictional aspects of the special action proceedings in the trial court, inasmuch as it is my opinion that the special action complaint filed by the Board of Supervisors against the Clerk of the Board stated a justiciable controversy within the scope of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Acts, A.R.S. §§ 12-1831 to 1846.
*398The allegations of the complaint relating to the jurisdictional question may be summarized as follows. A.R.S. § 11-241(4) requires that all county warrants issued by the Board for the payment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Ricca v. BojorquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Schwamm v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.