Legal Opinion

Ricca v. Bojorquez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 25, 1970No. 1 CA-CIV 1004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 24 — 341, a statute providing for the establishment of so-called “no-fence districts” upon the filing of petitions signed by a majority of taxpayers in a given area. The trial court, in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, held the statute to be unconstitutional. This appeal followed.

Before discussing the facts of this particular case, a few remarks about the background and purpose of no-fence districts will be made. At common law, an owner of livestock was liable for the damage caused when those animals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Birmingham v. MonkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Transamerica Title Insurance Co. v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Owens v. GLENARM LAND COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API