Ricca v. Bojorquez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 24 — 341, a statute providing for the establishment of so-called “no-fence districts” upon the filing of petitions signed by a majority of taxpayers in a given area. The trial court, in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, held the statute to be unconstitutional. This appeal followed.
Before discussing the facts of this particular case, a few remarks about the background and purpose of no-fence districts will be made. At common law, an owner of livestock was liable for the damage caused when those animals…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Birmingham v. MonkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Transamerica Title Insurance Co. v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Owens v. GLENARM LAND COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.