Legal Opinion
City of Manchester v. Secretary of State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 10, 2010No. 2009-791PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
These consolidated cases challenging the legality of a proposed amendment to the City of Manchester’s charter are before us on interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court (O’Neill, J.). See SUP. Ct. R. 9. We conclude that the amendment is invalid.
The following facts are recited in the interlocutory transfer statement or are supported by the record. On July 30,2008, the city clerk for the City of Manchester (City) received a charter amendment petition that proposed amending the City’s charter to limit annual budget increases “to the change in the National Consumer Price Index…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coco v. JaskunasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Town of Hooksett v. BainesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- City of Manchester School District v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. GuertinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- United States of America v. Crim. Steven PotterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Fred S. Teeboom v. City of Nashua Daniel Moriarty v.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- Fred S. Teeboom v. City of Nashua Daniel Moriarty v.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.