Legal Opinion

Fred S. Teeboom v. City of Nashua Daniel Moriarty v.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 2, 2019No. 2018-0171Published

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, C.J.

Plaintiff Fred S. Teeboom appeals an order of the Superior Court (Temple, J.) dismissing his claims for declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief based upon the court's determination that the budget spending cap1 in the Nashua city charter is unenforceable because it violates state law. We affirm.

I. Pertinent Facts

The trial court found the following facts. The spending cap was added to the Nashua city charter in November 1993. As quoted by the trial court, the spending cap provides:

Recognizing that final tax rates for the City are set by the New Hampshire Department of Revenue…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. Bill Duncan & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  5. Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API