Legal Opinion
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COUNTY OF KING v. Pierce
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 20, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0495PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Housing Authority of the County of King (“HACK”), to reconsider and amend this Court’s judgment of October 13,1988. On that date the Court, considering cross motions for summary judgment, granted judgment in favor of the defendant, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). Upon reconsideration, the Court concludes that its pri- or judgment displayed insufficient sensitivity to the concerns of due process. The Court, therefore, shall amend its prior judgment so as to grant HACK a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States v. YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Walsh v. McGeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Carillo v. FCA US LLC.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Murphy v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.