Legal Opinion

Washington v. Morantz

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylob, J.

The third-party defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice and for the dismissal of the complaint of the third-party plaintiff. The original action sought to establish a prescriptive right of way in favor of the plaintiffs in a portion of the defendants and third-party plaintiffs’ adjoining lands and for injunctive and divestitive relief. Alleging a covenant against incumbrance the third-party plaintiffs have brought in their grantor, the third-party defendant herein. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a.) While the cause awaited trial, the plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Williams v. Rhode Island Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Zuccelli v. City Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Sand & Gravel Corp. v. LipsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Arthur Venneri Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Johnson v. General Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Martinez v. NovinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. D'Arcangelo v. BurnettNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API