Legal Opinion
Arthur Venneri Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarry B. Frank, J.
Both defendants in Action No. 1 having, each independently of the other, consummated separate settlements with the plaintiff in that action, the instant motion for a severance and other related relief brings into question the extent to which the remainder of this consolidated action must be held to be affected by the dispositive consequences of the settlements.
The afore-mentioned codefendants in Action No. 1, Thomas C. Vincent Inc. and Central Heating & Plumbing Co., also appear as adversary parties in Action No. 2; and said Vincent, the plaintiff in the latter action, is the moving party…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- May v. 11½ East 49th Street Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boiler Engineering & Supply Co. v. General Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Hain v. Hewlett Arcade, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Lawrence Gregory v. La Posada Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
- Stone v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965