Legal Opinion
CITIZENS AGAINST CASINO GAMBLING v. Hogen
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2010No. 1:09-cr-00291PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 31, 2009, Plaintiffs commenced this action challenging the legality of a gambling casino operated by the Seneca Nation of Indians (“SNI”) in the City of Buffalo on land it acquired in 2005 (the “Buffalo Parcel”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, all government officials and agencies, acted illegally, arbitrarily, capriciously, and not in accordance with law when they determined the Buffalo Parcel is gaming-eligible “Indian land,” and approved the SNI’s second amended ordinance authorizing gambling on the Parcel.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Johnson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Soh v. SantmyerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022