Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Armstead

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1986No. 177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County discharging the defendant-ap-pellee, John Armstead, on the grounds that the Commonwealth failed to comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. We reverse.

The Commonwealth filed a criminal complaint against the appellee on November 3, 1982, charging him with burglary and attempted theft. Under the 180 day period mandated by Rule 1100, appellee’s mechanical run date was May 2, 1983. The run date is the date by which the Commonwealth must bring a defendant to trial under Rule 1100. See Pa.R.Crim.P.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. RiffertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. ReevesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. WentzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API