Legal Opinion
Winjum v. Jesten
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1934No. 29,857PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. There was included in the motion a motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law, which was likewise denied. The case was tried to the court without a jury on the pleadings and a stipulation of facts.
The brief facts are in substance: One Halvor H. Knutson, an incompetent person, was for some 21 years and until his death under guardianship. Ole J. Winjum was his guardian. The guardianship proceedings were brought and carried on in the probate court of Roseau county. Knutson died September 26,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Greenwood v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Pierce v. MaetzoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State ex rel. Beals v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Granger v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Wellner v. EcksteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Rickel v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In Re Guardianship of OverpeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In Re Guardianship of HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- MIDLAND NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. Comerica Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.