Legal Opinion

Lustig v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 23, 2001No. A-7756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEWART, Judge.

The police served a search warrant on Benjamin Lustig's property in Wasilla and seized marijuana and other evidence that led to Lustig's indictment on three counts of fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance. 1 Lustig moved to suppress the evidence seized when the warrant was executed, but the superior court denied the motion. Lustig pleaded no contest to one count of fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance 2 while preserving his right to appeal the denial of the suppression motion. 3 We affirm Lustig's conviction because we conclude…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Harrelson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
  4. McClelland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
  5. Landers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Garhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  3. State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
  4. State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API