State v. Crocker
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1DissentCoats, Chief Judge
In reviewing whether a magistrate properly issued a search warrant, this court is to give the magistrate’s findings great deference. This court “view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the warrant and will only invalidate the warrant if the magistrate abused her discretion.”1 We are *99to uphold the decision to issue the search warrant in doubtful or marginal cases.2. When I apply this standard, I conclude that the information contained in the warrant established a fair probability that Crocker possessed an unlawful amount of marijuana. I would therefore uphold the warrant.
I…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.