Hardin v. Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
This cause is now before the court on a motion filed November 30, 1938, wherein defendant seeks to have certain allegations stricken from the petition, all as in the motion set forth. The motion contains seven separate paragraphs containing requests to strike.
Upon a consideration of the motion and the briefs of counsel, the court finds and concludes as follows:
1. So much of the motion as is contained in paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7, the court finds not well taken, and the motion as to each of said paragraphs is overruled.
2. The court will consider so much of the motion…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bush v. SkidisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
- Martz v. AbbottDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Contogeorge v. SpyrouDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Lincoln v. HerrDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Prescan v. Aliquippa & Southern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.