Legal Opinion

Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1997No. 2934 C.D. 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

David Rebel (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that affirmed a referee’s decision determining that he was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 In general, Claimant questions whether the Board erred in determining that his refusal to submit to random drug testing in compliance with the policy of Duquesne Light Company (Employer) was without good cause, and whether the Board erred in determining that his refusal constituted willful misconduct, where Employer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Simpson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. American Racing Equipment, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Pma v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Architectural Testing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Kolenkiewicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Cox v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA DHSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Architectural Testing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API