Legal Opinion · Dissent

Architectural Testing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 2008Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) and to hold that George W. Yohe, II (Claimant) is ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e.l) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, added by Section 3 of the Act of December 9, 2002, P.L. 1330, 43 P.S. § 802(e.l). That provision relates to a claimant’s ineligibility for benefits “due to failure to submit and/or pass a drug test conducted pursuant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API