Legal Opinion

Northern Arapaho Tribe v. LaCounte

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 17, 2016No. CV-16-11-BLG-BMMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Brian Morris, United States District Court Judge

I. Procedural Background

Plaintiffs Northern Arapaho Tribe (“NAT”) allege that Defendants violated *992their right to self-govern when Defendants converted NAT’s funds and federal funds and programs established by Congress for the benefit of NAT. (Doc. 1.) NAT named Darrly LaCounte, Louise Reyes, Norma Gourneau, Ray Nation and Michael Black in their individual and official capacities. These Defendants (“Federal Defendants”) hold positions with the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”).

NAT initially named Darwin St. Clair and Clint Wagon, Chairman and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Magleby Construction Sun Valley v. SP Hotel OwnerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
  2. Yellowstone Electric Co. v. Crossharbor Capital Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API