Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Perrin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 1964No. Nos. 14334, 14335PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter called “State Farm”) sought de*566claratory judgment in the U. S. District Court, to the effect that State Farm had no obligation to afford Defendant-Appellant, David Perrin, any defense in actions pending against him, or to pay any damages to which David Perrin might become legally obligated, because of the alleged wrongful death of Charles Eugene Vaughn or because of the alleged injury to Vivian M. Vaughn.

David Perrin counterclaimed for damages sustained by him in his defense of the pending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Gendron v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Leslie v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. David Perrin, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Vivian M. Vaughn and Vivian M. Vaughn, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Eugene Vaughn, Deceased, Intervenor-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API