Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 12, 2006No. AC 26039PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Larry Davis, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of numerous criminal offenses stemming from separate informations. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) consolidated and failed to sever three separate informations, (2) admitted evidence of his parole status, (3) permitted his former criminal defense attorney to testify and (4) found that the defendant had violated the conditions of his probation. We disagree and affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. SwainConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. State v. OuelletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API