Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 18, 2008No. SC 17829PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the defendant, Larry Davis, had not been deprived of his right to a fair trial under the due process clause of the federal constitution1 by the joint trial of *20three legally unrelated informations.2 We conclude that, although the offenses charged in one of the three informations involved brutal and shocking conduct, the trial court’s thorough and proper jury instructions cured any risk of prejudice to the defendant. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. FanaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. State v. OuelletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API