Legal Opinion

In Re Cancellation of the Stabio Ditch Water Right on Spearfish Creek

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1987No. 15600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Eugene and Karol Johnson (Johnson) from a judgment entered by the circuit court affirming the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and final decision adopted by the Water Management Board (Board), Water Rights Division of the South Dakota Department of Water and Natural Resources. We affirm.

In October 1983 Johnson purchased real property from Stabio. Included in this purchase were eighty-eight (88) acres which had been irrigated under a water right dating back to April 1877. The land in controversy was continuously irrigated from the time the water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. GalatiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sturgeon v. BrooksWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hanson v. Brookings HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API