Legal Opinion
Sokolek v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 1994No. Docket 166408PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: Hood, P.J., and Cavanagh and D. A. Teeple, * JJ. Per Curiam.
Defendant seeks reversal of that part of the November 1, 1991, order of the Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board that held that the one-year-back rule for nursing or attendant care does not apply to this case.
On June 3, 1980, plaintiff filed a petition for a hearing, alleging a work-related injury to her back that occurred on April 16, 1980. An open award of benefits beginning on May 8, 1980, plaintiffs last day of work, was entered by a hearing referee. Neither party appealed.
In January 1982, plaintiff filed a new…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Achtenberg v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Allen v. Kalamazoo Paraffine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Nicholson v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Thomas v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Mason v. Michigan Trading Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matney v. Southfield BowlMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sokolek v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Sokolek v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Sokolek v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995