Legal Opinion

Clendaniel v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 (Section 10) of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (prior to its amendment in January 1982, by L. 1981, c. 533, § 1) (Act). Specifically, the issue here is whether N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 required the insurer to make available to the named *363insured additional personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for persons other than the named insured. We hold that the insurer was required to make available additional Section 10 PIP benefits not only to the named insured but also to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abbotts Dairies, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Ortiz v. Safeco Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Muschette v. the Gateway Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sotomayor v. VasquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Lilly v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Rodriguez v. Hudson County Collision Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Capelli v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Rosenberg v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API