Legal Opinion
Caminetti v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1941No. S. F. 16479PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this original proceeding in prohibition the petitioner, as Insurance Commissioner of the state, seeks to restrain the respondent Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco from proceeding with the hearing and determination of a cause now pending before it.
An alternative writ of prohibition was issued by this court upon a petition alleging that on August 15, 1940, the petitioner, as Insurance Commissioner, caused to be filed with the respondent Superior Court, pursuant to section 1011 of the Insurance Code, an application for order appointing him conservator of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- German Alliance Insurance v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bean v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Wicecarver v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rivera v. Division of Industrial WelfareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Doan v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Smith v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- W. A. Rose Co. v. Municipal Court for Oakland-Piedmont Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.