Wilson v. Still
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
In 1976 the Legislature abolished the civil causes of action for “alienation of affections” and “seduction”. Plaintiff brings this action, claiming to be aggrieved by her former husband’s leaving her for another woman. The defendant is the other woman. Plaintiff claims her suit should go forward as one for “intentional infliction of emotional distress”. Defendant asks that the case be dismissed as not authorized under present law. We must agree with the defendant.
Plaintiff filed this case pro se while also litigating her divorce in the District court in 1989. Her petition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Breeden v. League Services Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Mothershed v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Goodwin v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Bladen v. First Presbyterian Church of SallisawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.