Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Packard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action upon a covenant appended to a lease, brought by the administratrices of Walsh, the lessor and covenantee. The only objection urged to the plaintiffs’ recovery is, that, if the obligation of the covenant did not cease with the life. of Walsh, his heirs, and not his administrators, are the proper persons to sue upon it. The covenant is as follows : “ In consideration of the letting of the above described premises and one dollar to me paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I do hereby become surety for the prompt and full payment of the rent and performance of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. CulverNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Norcross v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Drummond v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Jones v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Bullard v. MoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mullins v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  2. Byron v. Concord National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Lincoln v. BurrageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Carl Clear Coal Corp. v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. Forbes v. DouglassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API