Legal Opinion

Byron v. Concord National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 9, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants from proceeding with a sale of certain real estate on levy of execution and for an accounting. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court, who made findings of facts in substance of this tenor: One Mary E. Byron died, testate, in October, 1927, leaving three parcels of real estate in Concord. Two of these parcels were specifically devised to certain plaintiffs, and the residue was devised in trust for certain minors whose guardian was a party to similar proceedings. The plaintiffs are devisees and representatives of devisees of these…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cardival v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Bullard v. MoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Riley v. BrusendorffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Trustees of Amherst College v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Frechette v. ThibodeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Bryan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Richardson v. Lee Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Dixie Savings Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. Krinsky v. Stevens Coal Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API