Morse v. O'Connell
Washington Supreme Court
Appecil from Superior Court, Clallam County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
The respondent, prior to the 26th day of March, 1890, made valuable improvements which were at that date and now are in actual use for trade and business upon the tide lands lying in front of the city of Port Angeles, in the harbor of Port Angeles, and claims a right to purchase, the land so improved under the act of the legislature of said date, commonly known as the tide land act. JSTo harbor line has ever been established in said harbor. The north side of Front street in said city is on the line of ordinary high tide. Respondent’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Weber v. Board of Harbor CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Ferry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- West Coast Improvement Co. v. WinsorWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Bouckaert v. State Board of Land CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Grande Ronde Lumber Co. v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.