Legal Opinion

West Coast Improvement Co. v. Winsor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894No. 1205PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King Gov/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— Respondent brought an action to restrain the appellants from driving piles upon a certain part of the tide lands in front of the city of Ballard. The complaint alleges, among other things, that respondent was the owner of the upland in front of which such portion of the tide land was situated. The appellants, in their answer, denied such ownership,.and set up the fact that they were in possession, with such improvements as were contemplated by the tide land act of 1890 (Laws, p. 431), at the date of its passage; and, as such improvers, were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Morse v. O'ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pierce v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heckman v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  2. Whitaker v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Van Siclen v. MuirWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Book v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Muir v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API