Legal Opinion

Cooke v. McShane

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for cutting a privet hedge standing along the boundary between the land of the plaintiff and that of the defendant. The trial court found the following facts: The hedge, while somewhat irregular, followed the boundary line as closely as could be expected of such a hedge; it was considered by both parties as a division fence; it had been allowed to grow wild, only occasionally being trimmed, was some ten or twelve feet high, and the tops of the bushes in places extended several feet over the land on either side of the boundary; the defendant lopped…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Cheshire Brass Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Ely v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  4. Mosman v. SanfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  5. Hine v. WoodingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Lemon v. CuringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Grosby v. HarperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API