Legal Opinion

Lemon v. Curington

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1957No. 8483PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs and defendant own adjoining land with a common boundary. Defendant’s predecessors in interest, in 1902, planted on the common boundary two poplar trees which have now grown to approximately four to five feet in diameter at the base; the trunks of the trees now extend upon the property of plaintiffs a distance of two or more feet, and four to five feet from a dwelling owned by plaintiffs. The branches have a spread of approximately thirty feet and project onto plaintiffs’ land. The court found that the roots are surface feeders and the roots of •one of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Shevlin v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Ackerman v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Harndon v. StultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Holmberg v. BerginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Ken Cowden Chevrolet, Inc v. CortsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Alvarez v. KatzSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API