Legal Opinion

Brain v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 21, 1986No. 85-0280PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, J.

Vicky and James Brain appeal from the judgment entered in this personal injury action and from the order denying their postverdict motions. They claim the trial court erred by excluding expert testimony on Vicky's lost future earning capacity and by refusing to instruct the jury on this issue. They also contend that the awards for Vicky's pain and suffering and for James's loss of consortium were inadequate, and that a new trial on damages is necessary in the interest of justice. Dwight Schmitz and his insurer, Sentry Insurance Company (Sentry), cross-appeal for a new trial on the question of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  2. State v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Staehler v. BeuthinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Hoekstra v. Guardian Pipeline, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API