Legal Opinion
Smith v. Little Pine Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 27, 1922No. 25015PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Certiorari from Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Action by M. B. Smith against the Little Pine Lumber Company, in which George C. Vaughan & Sons intervened and A. Lee Honeycutt filed a third opposition. Judgment for plaintiff and intervener. Judgment for intervener on the opposition was reversed by the Court of Appeal, and intervener applies for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
The opinion and decree herein handed down by the Court of Appeal are as follows:
“By Thompson, Judge:
“M, B. Smith, individually and as transferee, instituted suit against the Little Pine Lumber Company, on claims for advances and labor aggregating $5,588.28. Asserting a lien and privilege, a sequestration was issued, and there was seized thereunder all of the lumber on the millyard, on the tramroads and railroads and the logs in the woods belonging to said lumber company.
“George C. Vaughan & Sons, Inc., intervened in the suit, alleging that the lumber company was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Decuir v. DecuirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Gajan v. Patout & BurguieresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- First National Bank v. Fort Wayne Artificial Ice Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Harrison v. OttmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Durmeyer v. StreifferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Hart v. HardgraveLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Succession of BarthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- International Paper Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Bankston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.