Gajan v. Patout & Burguieres
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Emile Gajan and another against Patout & Burguieres, in which the L. P. Pa-tout Company, Limited, and also the liquidators of the State National Bank of New Orleans, filed third interventions and oppositions. A rule for contempt was filed by the liquidators, upon which an order was made directed to the L. P. Patout Company, Limited, and its president. Buie made absolute la certain particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
Buie for Contempt.
MONBOE, J.
The circumstances leading to this rule are, in part, narrated in the original opinion handed down in the above-entitled suit,-and reported in 133 La. 1060, 63 South. 585. Those which, for a clear understanding of the present situation, need be here recited, are as follows:
In 1906 the planting firm of Patout & Burguieres, composed of Mrs. Marie Olive Suberbielle, widow of L. P. Patout, and L. J. Burguieres, borrowed $50,000 from A. Adler & Co. for the making of a crop of sugar upon Yacherie plantation in the parish of St. Mary, and they gave their note for that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Melancton's Heirs v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830
- Succession of Martin v. Succession of HoggattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- Heirs of Stafford v. RenshawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Roussel v. Railways Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State ex rel. Southern Bank v. PilsburySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Succession of WhitnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Durmeyer v. StreifferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.