De La Rosa v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for possession of marihuana in an amount in excess of four ounces. Trial was to a jury with punishment being assessed at five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
Initially appellant alleges that the trial court erred in failing to grant his Motion to Discharge under Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 28.061 (Vernon Supp. 1980-1981) and the “Speedy Trial Act.” The record reflects that on October 30, 1978, appellant filed with the trial court an instrument designated “Motion For Discharge” which recited that appellant had…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Buford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.