Legal Opinion

Bernal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 15, 1982No. 04-81-00211-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTU, Justice.

These appeals are taken from convictions of rape. Appellants were tried jointly, and after conviction by a jury elected to have the trial court assess punishment. Each was sentenced to 20 years’ confinement.

Four of the contentions raised by appellants are identical in both appeals: they allege that a watch, a ring, clothing of the appellants, and their persons were seized as a result of an illegal search and improperly used as evidence; that the trial court improperly allowed the State to bolster the identification testimony of an unimpeached witness; that there were two…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Cameron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. Kessler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Lavado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API