State v. Biggs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
At the outset we consider and dispose of defendant’s contention that the evidence of premeditation and deliberation was not “substantial enough” to warrant submitting the case to the jury on the charge of first degree murder. The assignment is feckless. The familiar rule is that a motion to nonsuit “requires the trial court to consider the evidence in its light most favorable to the State, take it as true, and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.” State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509, 513, 160 S.E. 2d 469, 472 (1968). Furthermore, all…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.