Legal Opinion

In re Hartman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 82-19PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

We are presented with the following question for review: Does R.C. 2501.02 proscribe the appeal of juvenile court judgments and final orders rendered in juvenile traffic offender proceedings? In particular, this court must determine the import of the word “including” as used in the statute, for the disposition of the instant matter is clearly contingent upon the meaning herein ascribed to that term.

R.C. 2501.02(A) provides that the courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction:

“Upon an appeal upon questions of law to review, affirm, modify, set aside, or reverse judgments or final orders of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. Karl R. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Argosy Limited v. Franklin Hennigan, Individually and as Acting District Director of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In Re D.H.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Vermont Ass'n of Realtors, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API