Legal Opinion
In Re D.H.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 2018No. 2016-1195 and 2016-1197PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeWine, J.
*390 *310 {¶ 1} May a juvenile who is "bound over" to adult court immediately appeal the bindover decision, or must his appeal wait until the end of the adult-court proceedings? We conclude that the appeal must wait. That is what the Second District Court of Appeals decided, so we affirm its judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
{¶ 2} D.H. was 17 years old when he was charged in separate complaints with two counts of robbery. The juvenile court held a hearing, determined that D.H. was not amenable to rehabilitation in the juvenile system, and transferred jurisdiction to the adult court.
*311 {¶ 3} D.H. pled no contest to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BickerstaffOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Daniels v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. May (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Bowling v. DeWineOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Ames v. Rootstown Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2022
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.