Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Lieberman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 1940No. 7153PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

Consolidated Indemnity and Insurance Company, hereinafter called Consolidated, was a New York corporation engaged in the business of insurance and indemnity In order to qualify as surety upon contracts for the City of Philadelphia and pursuant to the requirements of an ordinance of that city approved July 21, 1887, it deposited with the Broad Street Trust Company, of Philadelphia, bonds of the face value of $100,000. This was done under the terms of a depository agreement executed by Consolidated and a custodian agreement executed by Broad Street Trust Company November…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Northumberland County Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Pollock v. Pittsburgh, Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Ardesco Oil Co. v. North American Oil & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. James H. Christiansen v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Citizens Banking Co. v. Monticello State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Westfall v. Caterpillar, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API