Legal Opinion

Woolery v. Woolery

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This was a suit by the appellees against the appellants for partition of two hundred acres of land in Putnam county, of which, in September, 1866, Abrahani Woolery, the ancestor, died seized and intestate. The plaintiffs below are four of the children of the intestate. The defendants, who are the appellants here, are Martha Woolery, the widow, William M. and John J. Woolery, sons, and William O. Mart, the grand-son of the decedent.

*250On the 26th of September, 1864, said Abraham Woolery purchased a tract of land containing eighty acres, situate in Edgar county, Illinois, of the value of $2,400,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Dillman v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Stanley v. BrannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  4. Inhabitants of Milford v. Inhabitants of BellinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  5. Hodgson v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ruch v. BieryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hamlyn v. NesbitIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Baum v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Dilley v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Bruce v. SlempSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API