Legal Opinion

Ruch v. Biery

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1887No. 12,062PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the.Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On the 17th day of March, 1883, William H. Ruch, as administrator of the estate of Peter Ruch, deceased, filed his final account and report-, showing that the estate had been fully settled, leaving a stated balance in his hands for distribution to the widow and heirs at law. He .showed that all the debts and claims against the estate had been paid, and that the surplus in his hands consisted largely in claims against certain of the heirs of the decedent. He asked an order of the court authorizing him to distribute the surplus, and empowering him to allow such of the distributees as were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sherman v. ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Clark v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  3. Dilley v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Peabody v. PeabodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Parks v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fiscus v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Leighton v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Schumacher v. Adams Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Baum v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API