City of Daly City v. Holbrook
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.
This is an action to eject the defendants from a piece of land on the ground that the same is a part of a public highway, and to recover damages for use and occupation. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendants present the case to this court on an appeal from the judgment with their bill of exceptions.
The facts of the case, from the standpoint of the defendants, are briefly as follows: The plaintiff is a municipal corporation, organized in 1911, as a city of the sixth class. The land in controversy lies within its boundaries. At all times mentioned in the case,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Hargro v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martin v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Abar v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gross v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- County of Sacramento v. LauszusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Larkey v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.