Legal Opinion

In Re Paull's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1950No. 33448PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

The district court of Cleveland county denied an application to probate a purported holographic will of Alice M. Pauli, deceased. It had been offered for probate by W. H. Burgess, the named executor under the purported will, and Lorna M. Burgess, his wife and the chief beneficiary thereunder. The instrument had been denied probate in the county court, and they had appealed to the district court, and from the district court’s action the Burgesses have appealed here. Claude R. Pauli and other heirs of Alice M. Pauli, deceased, had contested the application to probate, and will be referred to as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Creger's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Estate of AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Youngblood v. RectorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Day v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. In Re Lewis' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Matter of Estate of RigsbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Foreman v. ForemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF OAKLEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
  5. In re the Estate of ChargualafDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API