Legal Opinion
State v. Bel Fior Hotel
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*902OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert C. Williams, J.
Petitioner seeks an order pursuant to subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law permanently enjoining and restraining the respondent from conducting and transacting its business in a persistently fraudulent and illegal manner. In addition, petitioner seeks an order of this court which would require restitution by respondent of all moneys and funds respondent acquired as a result of the alleged fraudulent and illegal practices.
It is necessary to examine the factual setting of this case prior to discussing the law relevant thereto.
Respondent is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Lefkowitz v. McMillenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trustco Bank, National Ass'n v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Rosenthal v. HelferCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Horning v. Horning Construction, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Bel Fior HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980