Legal Opinion
Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 21, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Judgment affirmed, without costs.
In our opinion, the lessor failed to satisfy its implied promise to deliver possession of the premises on the date fixed by the lease for the commencement of the term, or within a reasonable time thereafter (cf. Real Property Law, § 223-a; Rein v. Metrik Co., 200 Misc. 231; Hartwig v. 6465 Realty Co., 67 Misc 2d 450 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]). Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to consider whether the doctrine of unconscionability (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), relied upon by the court below as a basis for plaintiff’s recovery (see Seabrook v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Rein v. Robert Metrik Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- Hartwig v. 6465 Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Bel Fior HotelNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Knudsen v. LaxWatertown City Court · 2007
- Halprin v. 2 Fifth Avenue Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979