Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 3, 1994No. 01-92-01111-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This case presents a serious question about the application of the provision of the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, which declares no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb....” 1

Donald Wayne Sullivan, the appellant, filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus alleging the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution would be violated by trying him a third time for murder. After receiving evidence at hearing, the trial court denied the appellant habeas corpus relief. We affirm.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ellis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. People v. SierbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. KylesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  5. Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API