Legal Opinion
Miller v. Barry
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1992No. 91AP-966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Company appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, where a jury found in favor of appellee Sun Miller in this R.C. 4123.519 occupational disease trial. Appellant assigns two errors for review:
“I. Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Company was entitled to a directed verdict at the close of appellee’s case.
“II. The trial court should not have allowed Betty Briggs and Nancy Osterloh, non-expert witnesses, to testify regarding their jobs and their physical ailments.”
In the first assignment of error, appellant maintains that appellee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Patterson v. ConnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howell v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jackson v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Prejean v. Euclid Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bishop v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- White v. Center Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998