Legal Opinion

Miller v. Barry

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1992No. 91AP-966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Company appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, where a jury found in favor of appellee Sun Miller in this R.C. 4123.519 occupational disease trial. Appellant assigns two errors for review:

“I. Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Company was entitled to a directed verdict at the close of appellee’s case.
“II. The trial court should not have allowed Betty Briggs and Nancy Osterloh, non-expert witnesses, to testify regarding their jobs and their physical ailments.”

In the first assignment of error, appellant maintains that appellee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Patterson v. ConnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howell v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Jackson v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Prejean v. Euclid Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Bishop v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. White v. Center Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API